Delivering change for the better ...
Parliamentary session proves productive
Innisfil Scope
June 23, 2008
by Peter Van Loan, MP, York-Simcoe
As
Members of Parliament head back to their
ridings for the summer, journalists like to
pass judgment on how productive the past
year has been.
In doing so,
they are evaluating the job I have done -
because a Government House Leader is
responsible for getting business through the
House of Commons.
Almost all journalists, including the many
that are not sympathetic to the Conservative
Party, admit that we got lots done on our
agenda.
A quick review
confirms that we are delivering results,
doing what we said we would do, and most
surprisingly, achieving it all despite the
minority status of our Government.
With
the Senate still looking at legislation we
sent them, already 28 Bills have become law
in the past 8 months or so.
More important
than the number of Bills becoming law is
what those laws do.
We are
delivering on the promises we made to
Canadians in priority areas.
Our
Tackling Violent Crime Bill bundled five
pieces of legislation that had been delayed
and obstructed by the Liberals.
By putting them
together, and risking an election if it
didn't become law, we got it passed through
both the House and the stubborn Liberal
majority in the Senate - who mostly imitated
their Liberal colleagues in the House of
Commons by not voting on it.
As a
result, we now have tough, mandatory prison
sentences for those who commit crimes with
guns.
Repeat violent
criminals must prove why they shouldn't be
declared dangerous offenders.
Children are
better protected from adult sex
offenders...all this and more are now law.
On
the financial front, we cut taxes, delivered
our third balanced budget, and paid another
$10 billion down on the national debt -
which is now $37 billion dollars lower since
we formed government.
Families are better off,
as tax cuts became law, including another
reduction in the GST, lower personal income
tax rates, an increased basic personal
exemption, and more.
Many were surprised to
see a consensus arrived at to extend the
mission in Afghanistan
to 2011.
The vote in
Parliament was a vote of confidence not just
in our government, but in the extraordinary
work of our armed forces in improving the
lives of Afghans.
The Indian Residential
Schools Apology was a highlight for many, as
was passage of the Specific Claims Bill
which should speed up resolution of many
claims by establishing a legal process with
a finite end.
In
reflecting on all these accomplishments and
more, I take particular pride - as I had a
very real role in making each accomplishment
happen.
That is, of
course, because as House Leader I steer the
items through the House, negotiating with
the Opposition, calling their bluffs on
occasion, crafting approaches that will
work, and when necessary, making our case
through the media.
Some journalists prefer to focus on the
theatre of Question Period, and are critical
of the "tone" in Parliament.
But, of course,
that is the part of what we do that "belongs
to the Opposition, not the Government.
So, if you are
unhappy with that negative tone, it's the
Opposition who are responsible.
The Liberals - trapped by the fact that they
have allowed almost all our substantial
policies to pass - instead chose to focus on
"scandals" in the daily Question Period.
However, the
controversies they squawked about,
repeatedly turn out to be false accusations.
The Liberals made false accusations that the
Minister of the Environment interfered with
the Ottawa Mayoral election.
When the OPP
cleared the Minister, they falsely accused
the police of inappropriate behaviour.
When the Police
Complaints Commissioner found this Liberal
accusation to be false too, OPP Commissioner
Julian Fantino took the extraordinary step
of saying the only interference was on the
part of a Liberal MP.
On the Mulroney-Schreiber
affair, the Ethics Commissioner rejected
false Liberal accusations against
Conservative MP's - but did find a Liberal
guilty of conflict of interest.
The Cadman Affair? The
RCMP cleared the Prime Minister.
NAFTA?
The Clerk of the
Privy Council cleared the Prime Minister's
Chief of Staff.
Other amazing Liberal
false accusations included a government
contract never given (again cleared by the
Ethics Commissioner) and a patronage
appointment that was never made (only
Liberals would consider it a "scandal" when
a patronage job isn't handed out).
In
every case, the Liberals leveled false
accusations in Question Period for weeks,
where the rules of Parliament provide
"privilege" - meaning that they can't be
sued for false libel and slander.
Every time the
truth finally demonstrated the accusations
were false, the Liberals never showed the
decency to apologize - sometimes even
ignoring the findings, and continuing their
smears.
My
most high profile role in the government is
to defend my colleagues against such
baseless attacks.
Since the
Liberals prefer this to serious questions
and debate on policy, I have had quite a
workout.
The Ottawa
Citizen dubbed me "The Answer Man" and
MacLean’s preferred "The Man Who Ate
Question Period."
While that part of the job doesn't achieve
much, I did it well enough that we were able
to use the rest of our time in the House to
get our priority bills passed.
That may not get
as much attention on the news - but lower
taxes, less debt, and tackling crime are the
things you told me you wanted from us in
government.
This year, we delivered real results for
you.
- 30 -
Contact
Information:
Parliament Hill Office
T 613-996-7752
F 613-992-8351
E
vanloan.p@parl.gc.ca
>>> Read More
Articles <<<
|